Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Image Added


Project Scope 

Central monitoring is an emerging field with an unclear scope, goals and roles. Central monitoring, if executed appropriately, can have a positive impact on data quality, patient safety and clinical trial efficiencies. This project will work to define central monitoring (including differentiating from data management and other forms of data surveillance), and suggest success measures and best practices to ensure a well-connected end-to-end component of quality risk management. The project will provide insight and guidance to address understanding as well as the current and future needs of holistic central monitoring process and capabilities. Strong central monitoring practices can support early-study risk reduction and, through important trend analysis and mitigation, decrease preventable errors that can have an impact on patient safety or clinical trial conclusions. Our approach will encourage exploration of different approaches versus recommendations so as not to deter sponsor innovation (e.g. points to consider).

In

Image Removed

Project

Scope

  • Access to study data with the ability to aggregate various data sources
of data enabling
  • to enable oversight of the clinical data and operational data in near real time. This includes frequency of data transfers, audit
trail
  • trails, and facilitating PI oversight of medical care of patients.
  • Ideal technology requirements (very broad – patients, sites,
CRO-Sponsor
  • CRO–Sponsor connection) and new vendor qualification expectations.
Data
  • Cross-functional data review plan (medical review, statistics, data cleaning activities, operational, etc.), with clear defined purpose of what each role is reviewing, what, when and why.
  • Definition of robust “monitoring” strategy, as required by the ICH.
  • Connection to on-site monitoring, using centralised monitoring to determine on-site monitoring needs,
    site trends allowing for early, targeted site feedback for CRA to have more focused site engagement.
Discuss
  • Discussion of different data oversight strategies and methodologies and when to consider use of
    visualisations related to types of data reviewed (visualisations that are focused on critical data only,
    visualisation, that could contribute to a significant deviation vs. all deviations).
Facilitate
  • Facilitated risk mitigation through conducting the trial, ensuring risk linkage to
Central Monitoring
  • central monitoring oversight.



Project LeadsEmail
Nicole Stansbury (Syneos Health)nicole.stansbury@syneoshealth.com
Anne Lawrence (AbbVie)anne.lawrence@abbvie.com
Objectives and DeliverablesTimelines
White PaperQ32022
White PaperQ42022
Ann Fleenor, Astellasann.fleenor@astellas.com
Jennifer Krohn, GileadJenn.Krohn@gilead.com
Shawntel Swannack, Emmessswannack@emmes.com
Alex Pearce, PHUSE Project Assistant

alexandra@phuse.global


Status
colourBlue
titleCurrent Status

Q1/2022Project approved Q1 2022Project MembersOrganisationsAndy Lawton IndependentCatherine SinclairGSKCrupa KurienPfizerGeorgina WoodCyntegrityGregory LongRocheJean MulindeFDALynne CesarioPfizerMarion Wolfs

JNJ

Priti GuptaSamantha HewlettAmgen
Project Statement

Central Monitoring is an emerging field with an unclear scope, goals and roles. Central Monitoring, if executed appropriately, can have a positive impact on data quality, patient safety and clinical trial efficiencies. This project will work to define Central Monitoring (including differentiating from data management and other forms of data surveillance), suggest success measures and best practices to ensure a well-connected end-to-end component of quality risk management.

Project Impact

The project will provide insight and guidance to address understanding as well as the current and future needs of holistic Central Monitoring process and capabilities. Strong Central Monitoring practices can support risk reduction and through important trend analysis and mitigation, decrease preventable errors that can have an impact on patient safety or clinical trial conclusions. Our approach will encourage exploration of different approaches versus recommendations as not deter sponsor innovation (e.g - points to consider).

Q2 2024

  • Regrouped with new leads Ann, Shawntel and Jennifer 
  • Reviewed and edited current member roster and email distribution list
  • Gathered several Community forum topics for 2024 as part of RBQM education focus



Objectives Timelines
White Paper – Challenges in Central Monitoring Implementation Q3 2022
White Paper – Defining Central Monitoring ValueQ2 2023


 DeliverablesType of Deliverable 
Challenges in Central Monitoring Implementation White Paper
Defining Central Monitoring ValueWhite Paper