Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Project Scope

Develop a Data Reviewer’s Guide Template (referenced in the Technical Conformance Guide) and associated documents to allow up front communications regarding the sponsors interpretation of the Bio-research Monitoring Technical Conformance Guide. Initially, the scope will include the development of the template and then expand to cover the full suite of documents. The current cSDRG and ADRG templates will be considered to avoid unnecessary duplication of content. Therefore, revision of these templates are not in scope.



Project LeadsEmail
Jonas Holger Poulssonjhop@novonordisk.com
Julie Maynardjmaynar1@its.jnj.com
Jonas Holger Poulsson
jhop@novonordisk.com
Sopan Kaithsopan.kaith@tcs.com
Wendy Dobson (PHUSE Project Manager)

wendy@phuse.global


Objectives & DeliverablesTimelines
Kick Off Project
April
Apr-2021
Template & Completion Guidelines
October
Oct-2021
Examples
December
Dec-2021


Status
colourBlue
titleCurrent Status
 Q12021

Team are due to kick off their project 21st April. Sections of the White Paper will be assigned to project members to work offline together and curate. Bi-weekly calls will be established from 19th May.


Problem Statement

FDA drafted the initial Bio-research Monitoring Technical Conformance Guide in December 2017, with an updated version published in July 2020 (https://www.fda.gov/media/85061/download). The guide provides specifications for preparing and submitting the following components in electronic format that are used by FDA for planning of Bio-research Monitoring (

BiMO

BIMO) inspections.

  • Clinical Study-Level Information.
  • Subject-Level Data Line Listings by Clinical Site.
  • Summary-Level Clinical Site Dataset (clinsite.xpt).

NDA, BLA, and supplemental submissions to FDA require

BiMO

BIMO as a critical part of the electronic application.

There is currently a lack of clarity

,

as each sponsor will have defined their own approach to the generation of this content, especially where there is a need to interpret the Technical Conformance Guide. 

Problem Impact

This need for interpretation leads to inconsistencies between

sponsors

Sponsors when submitting this content to the

Agency

agency.  Potentially, this results in the need for

sponsors

Sponsors to provide additional clarification to the

Agency

agency subsequent to the submission of the content.




Project
MembersOrganisationProject 
MembersOrganisation
Aatiya ZaidiGilead
Michael JohnsonFDA
Amie SagadyTakeda
Meng LiAstraZeneca
Aohra MonceauxSanofi
Nancy BauerBoehringer Ingelheim
Barbara LockleyIndustry
Nigel MontgomeryRoche
Bhanu KannanFDA
Phil LiuAstraZeneca
Bei YuFDA
Phyllis SmetanaUCB
Cara AlfaroFDA
Randi McFarlandICON
Cathy MichalskyTrevena
Sai Ma
Bayer
Chunying YinJanssen Research & Development
Shreetam SheregarCovance
Cynthia KleppingerFDA
Srinivasan RamasubramanianAbbVie
Dmitry GolubovskyTeva Pharm 
Stanley Brill
Janssen Research & Development
Karen BleichFDA
Steve FitzpatrickNovartis
Kathryn KnucklesEli Lilly
Steven ClarkAstellas
Kirsty WallGSK
Todd RiderBMS
Jack FieldAstraZeneca
Lin YuanAstellas 




Project MembersOrganisation
Lisa ZhouJanssen Research & Development
Michael JohnsonFDA
Meng LiAstraZeneca
Nancy BauerBoehringer Ingelheim
Nigel MontgomeryRoche
Phil LiuAstraZeneca
Phyllis SmetanaUCB
Randi McFarlandICON
Sai MaBayer
Shreetam SheregarCovance
Srinivasan RamasubramanianAbbVie
Stanley BrillJanssen Research & Development
Steve FitzpatrickNovartis
Steven ClarkAstellas
Todd RiderBMS