Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Working Groups Hot Topics

Image Added


PHUSE collaborations are organised into a number of specialist Working Groups, each with a broad topic area. The Working Groups have specific projects designed to achieve a set of particular objectives.
 
This page will highlight the latest news and information from our projects. Participation is open to anyone who wants to contribute and if you would like to get involved,
email: 
please email workinggroups@phuse.global.

Image Removed

Data Transparency Summer Event 2022

Data Transparency Summer Event: Registration opens 30 May. 

Image Removed

CSS 2022

CSS: Registration now open! Click here to register before 1 July to benefit from the discounted Early Bird rate.

Call for Posters! Submit an abstract here before 10 June. 

Image Removed

Projects Calling for Members

Email workinggroups@phuse.global to get involved

Test Dataset Factory Members 

Several Working Group projects develop and specify medical research methods, features or processes, and some even create software components or sub-systems for common tasks in drug development. As part of these efforts, a variety of SDTM or ADaM test datasets are required. The typical fallback position of project teams is to use data from the CDISC pilot project and/or anonymised study data that are provided by project team members. The Test Dataset Factory project aims to provide test data formatted in SDTM and ADaM that support a more systematic and comprehensive testing of these concepts and scripts.

End-to-End Open–source Collaboration Guidance Members 

The use of open-source languages continues to increase in clinical reporting. This has helped shift pan-industry collaborations to move beyond the traditional domain of collaboration on statistical packages. Within multiple companies, we are seeing a shift where individuals may, as part of their role, contribute primarily to projects in the open-source setting. Numerous collaborations exist, with several coalescing under an umbrella collaboration called the pharmaverse. However, there remains a lack of understanding within companies around the benefits and risks of open sourcing. 

This project is led by two presenters from the PHUSE CSS 2021 open-source panel and continues on from discussions and points at that event. The primary aim of the project is to provide guidance, collaboration and creation of open-source projects, as well as to link out to more information. If gaps are found, they will be noted for later follow-up and potential follow-on projects. 

Deliverables Calling for Feedback If you wish to view the extensive list of all PHUSE published deliverables, click hereSEND Industry Feedback Survey  Sponsored by the PHUSE Nonclinical Working Group, the 2022 survey will solicit your input on topics such as scope of SEND, implementing flexibility in SEND, manual editing and non-CDISC proposals.  Please complete the survey to help evaluate the usability of the current SEND standard and to express your preferences for next steps. Click here to complete the survey, closes 23 May. Project Idea?


Image Added


Open Source – Regulatory Acceptance of Open-Source Submissions

Registration for the Open Source Open Forum is open!

The Open Source Technology in Clinical Data Analysis (OSTCDA) project is hosting their fourth Open Forum: Regulatory Acceptance of Open-Source Submissions, they will be addressing the following questions:

  • Will the FDA accept data and analyses generated with solutions developed and available as open source?
  • Will other regulatory agencies accept data and analyses generated with solutions developed and available as open source?

Come and be a part of our next virtual Open Forum on 12 July at 15:00(BST) 10:00(EDT).

Status
colourBlue
titleRegister Here


Understanding the Complete Journey of RWD, from Data Source to Final Analysis 

Registration for the RWE Community Forum is open!

The Real World Evidence Working Group is hosting their third Community Forum of the year! This forum will looking at 'Understanding the Complete Journey of RWD, from Data Source to Final Analysis'. As an industry, we are continuously accumulating experiences in working with real-world data (RWD) sources that collectively yield benefits – from enhanced generalisability of findings to facilitating faster approval timelines. However, these efforts are not without their challenges.

Come and be a part of our next virtual Community Forum on 11 July at 14:00(BST) 9:00(EDT).

Status
colourBlue
titleRegister Here


Image Added


The Dataset-JSON as Alternative Transport Format for Regulatory Submissions project within the Optimizing the Use of Data Standards Working Group, has published a new white paper. A pilot was executed to test the feasibility of using Dataset-JSON as a transport format for study data submitted with regulatory applications. The goal was to demonstrate that Dataset-JSON can serve as a transport file for study data without loss of data and no significant impact to business operations.  

CDISC Dataset-JSON is a modern dataset format designed for data exchange. Many software applications already import and export JSON and in the longer term more significant benefits will emerge as the constraints imposed by XPT are removed. 

Overall, the findings were consistent across industry and the FDA supporting the use of Dataset-JSON as an alternative transport format for XPT v5.  There were several key findings from the pilot and the solutions to these will be implemented in Dataset-JSON v1.1 (due end of 2024). 

PHUSE and CDISC will continue to collaborate with the FDA/PMDA to discuss next steps for regulatory support. FDA/CDER/CBER testing strongly suggests that analytical tools used for regulatory review are updated to take advantage of the metadata and flexibility provided by the Dataset-JSON format. 


The SEND Industry Feedback Surveyproject within the Nonclinical Topics Working Group, has published the 2024 SEND Survey Results. The survey was presented at the PHUSE/FDA Computational Science Symposium (CSS) 2024 and covered topics such as Manual Edits, Implementing SEND, Harmonisation and Next Steps.


The Adverse Event Collection Recommendations project within the Safety Analytics Working Group, has published a new white paper The Adverse Event Collection Recommendations. This white paper provides recommendations for adverse event (AE) collection and associated instructions for Phase II to III clinical trials, building on standardisation efforts by Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) and PHUSE. The primary intent is to reduce the variation in AE collection and instructions to improve the site experience and the quality of the data.


The Quality and Reusability of Real World Data project within the Real World Evidence Working Group, has published two new Blogs! The 'Understanding the Data Quality Issues in Real-World Data Through Real-World Examples', blog takes a closer look at the experiences shared within the dedicated Working Group in exploring the types of data quality hurdles encountered when using Real-World Data (RWD).The 'Considerations for the Use of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products' blog explores the use of Real-World Evidence (RWE) as a powerful tool for informing regulatory decisions and advancing medical innovation.


The Educate the General Population on Data Privacy and Data Sharing project, within the Data Transparency Working Group has published video 2 of their series. The 'What Will I Receive and When Will I Receive It?The video covers topics such as the concept of consent to participate in a clinical trial, an overview of trial design and treatment procedures to develop a strong foundational understanding of clinical trials. To view the full series of videos created by this team, visit the PHUSE website


Image Added


The Enhanced Risk-based Quality Management (RBQM) Approaches for First-in-Human and/or Small Clinical Trialsa new project within the Risk Based Quality ManagementWorking Group, is now calling for volunteers. This project aims to to discuss and focus on a robust strategy/process and best practices for:

  • Identifying critical items
  • Risk Based data review approaches
  • Risk Based Monitoring approach strategy (tSDV/tSDR)
  • Usage of analytical tools and methods for data review & central monitoring, including limitations on (statistical) methodologies
  • Identification of thresholds or equivalent on limited patient data
  • Targeted medical review
  • Strategy to adequately anticipate on highly dynamic data
  • Establish links with the other work streams on FIH/small studies focus

If you would like to volunteer or learn more about this project, email workinggroups@phuse.global. Closing date: 5 July

Multiple projects within Working Groups are open to join. PHUSE welcomes new members who can apply their knowledge to bring fresh ideas and contribute to the ongoing work of PHUSE projects. For more information, click here, read the Welcome Pack or email workinggroups@phuse.global


Image Added


Working Groups Report: Includes project updates, recent and upcoming deliverables and future plans for each Working Group.

Monthly Mailings: The monthly newsletter. Here you will find a full update from each month of the year, easily accessible and divided into key areas of PHUSE.

PHUSE Blogs: Fancy a quick read? A blog is a perfect way to catch up on all things Working Groups. Get the lowdown on the latest events from across the globe and stay updated on industry topics brought to you by industry professionals. 


Image Added


Initiate and lead a new project under the PHUSE Working Groups umbrella. The new project must address problems of significant relevance to computational science related to drug,

biologic

biological and device development and must meet all of the guidelines for projects within the collaboration, including the following mandatory requirements: 

  • The projects must address significant research issues relevant to Computational Science
  • The project must not attempt to address FDA policy issues
  • There must be at least one Project Lead personally involved in planning and carrying out the project

New projects can be submitted anytime during the year, click here

for template and submission.

Image Removed

Working Groups Latest Report: Q12022

This Report provides a detailed overview of the projects progress this past quarter.

to submit.