Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Working Groups Hot Topics

Image Added


PHUSE collaborations are organised into a number of specialist Working Groups, each with a broad topic area. The Working Groups have specific projects designed to achieve a set of particular objectives.
 
This page will highlight the latest news and information from our projects. Participation is open to anyone who wants to contribute and if you would like to get involved, please
email:
email workinggroups@phuse.global.

Data Transparency Summer Event 2022

Data Transparency Summer Event: Last chance to register! Taking place 28-30 June, this virtual and free event is not one to be missed. Click here to view the full agenda and to register. 

CSS 2022

CSS: This year's PHUSE/ FDA CSS takes place 19-21 September. To find out more, take a look at the agenda on the PHUSE website. For this event, the reduced Early Bird rate ends 1 July. Don't miss out, Click here to register! 


Image Added


Open Source – Regulatory Acceptance of Open-Source Submissions

Registration for the Open Source Open Forum is open!

The Open Source Technology in Clinical Data Analysis (OSTCDA) project is hosting their fourth Open Forum: Regulatory Acceptance of Open-Source Submissions, they will be addressing the following questions:

  • Will the FDA accept data and analyses generated with solutions developed and available as open source?
  • Will other regulatory agencies accept data and analyses generated with solutions developed and available as open source?

Come and be a part of our next virtual Open Forum on 12 July at

       Community Forum

The Role of the Statistician and Statistical Programmer in Real-World Data Analysis:

The Real World Evidence project, part of the Emerging Trends and Technologies Working Group, presents the next PHUSE Community Forum, taking place 6 July,

15:00(BST)

/

10:00(

EST

EDT).

Use of real-world data in regulatory submissions is growing. Real-world data provides unique insights which can be used for informed decision-making, resulting in faster drug approval. However, the nature of real-world data is quite different from that of clinical trial data. While the latter can be controlled at all stages, from collecting to reporting, this is not the case for real-world data. This imposes many challenges including pre-study alignment with regulatory agencies regarding validity of the data used. How does this affect the roles and corresponding responsibilities of various cross-functional clinical team members?

This meeting will start with a 30-minute presentation focused on the changes necessary
to use real-world data followed by a forum discussion on how this affects
the role of the statistical programmer and the statistician.

Date: 6 July 2022

Time: 15:00 (BST)/ 10:00 (EST) 

Register here!

Image Removed

                                        

Recently Published Deliverables

If you wish to view the extensive list of all PHUSE published deliverables, click here

Bio-research Monitoring Data Reviewers Guide (BDRG) – The Optimizing the Use of Data Standards Working Group and the PHUSE BIMO Project Team are pleased to announce the publication of the Bio-research Monitoring Data Reviewer’s Guide (BDRG) Package. This reviewer’s guide was created to provide the industry with a consistent way and usable format for communicating information concerning the Bio-research Monitoring (BIMO) data to regulatory agency reviewers. The BDRG package includes an Introduction and Overview, Template, Completion Guidelines and three Examples.

Best Practices for the Submission of Data in Japan  The PHUSE Japan e-Data Submission team has recently published a White Paper on the electronic submission of data to the PMDA. This White Paper was part of the project's aim in creating materials that will help global personnel submit electronic data to the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). 

Recommendations for SEND Dataset QC Best Practices – The SEND Dataset QC Best Practices project within the Nonclinical Topics Working Group have been busy working on a new deliverable which has recently been published. The White Paper provides key insights into current QC activities performed by industry as well as best practice recommendations for QC procedures. The aim is to promote more consistent QC procedures to help regulatory reviewers be more confident the SEND data accurately represents the data in the study report.

SDTM ADaM Implementation FAQThe SDTM ADaM Implementation FAQ project, under the Optimizing the Use of Data Standards Working Group, has published a new response to a question they received under Validation/Conformance Rules. The question is based on whether an SDTM domain that is in the SDTM IG v3.3 be used for a study that is using the SDTM IG v3.2 to map the study data.

Image Removed

Projects Calling for Members 

For more information on the PHUSE Working Groups and their projects, click here. If you would like to become a valued member of PHUSE and volunteer for one or multiple projects, please email: workinggroups@phuse.global

Project Idea?

Status
colourBlue
titleRegister Here


Understanding the Complete Journey of RWD, from Data Source to Final Analysis 

Registration for the RWE Community Forum is open!

The Real World Evidence Working Group is hosting their third Community Forum of the year! This forum will looking at 'Understanding the Complete Journey of RWD, from Data Source to Final Analysis'. As an industry, we are continuously accumulating experiences in working with real-world data (RWD) sources that collectively yield benefits – from enhanced generalisability of findings to facilitating faster approval timelines. However, these efforts are not without their challenges.

Come and be a part of our next virtual Community Forum on 11 July at 14:00(BST) 9:00(EDT).

Status
colourBlue
titleRegister Here


Image Added


The Dataset-JSON as Alternative Transport Format for Regulatory Submissions project within the Optimizing the Use of Data Standards Working Group, has published a new white paper. A pilot was executed to test the feasibility of using Dataset-JSON as a transport format for study data submitted with regulatory applications. The goal was to demonstrate that Dataset-JSON can serve as a transport file for study data without loss of data and no significant impact to business operations.  

CDISC Dataset-JSON is a modern dataset format designed for data exchange. Many software applications already import and export JSON and in the longer term more significant benefits will emerge as the constraints imposed by XPT are removed. 

Overall, the findings were consistent across industry and the FDA supporting the use of Dataset-JSON as an alternative transport format for XPT v5.  There were several key findings from the pilot and the solutions to these will be implemented in Dataset-JSON v1.1 (due end of 2024). 

PHUSE and CDISC will continue to collaborate with the FDA/PMDA to discuss next steps for regulatory support. FDA/CDER/CBER testing strongly suggests that analytical tools used for regulatory review are updated to take advantage of the metadata and flexibility provided by the Dataset-JSON format. 


The SEND Industry Feedback Surveyproject within the Nonclinical Topics Working Group, has published the 2024 SEND Survey Results. The survey was presented at the PHUSE/FDA Computational Science Symposium (CSS) 2024 and covered topics such as Manual Edits, Implementing SEND, Harmonisation and Next Steps.


The Adverse Event Collection Recommendations project within the Safety Analytics Working Group, has published a new white paper The Adverse Event Collection Recommendations. This white paper provides recommendations for adverse event (AE) collection and associated instructions for Phase II to III clinical trials, building on standardisation efforts by Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) and PHUSE. The primary intent is to reduce the variation in AE collection and instructions to improve the site experience and the quality of the data.


The Quality and Reusability of Real World Data project within the Real World Evidence Working Group, has published two new Blogs! The 'Understanding the Data Quality Issues in Real-World Data Through Real-World Examples', blog takes a closer look at the experiences shared within the dedicated Working Group in exploring the types of data quality hurdles encountered when using Real-World Data (RWD).The 'Considerations for the Use of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products' blog explores the use of Real-World Evidence (RWE) as a powerful tool for informing regulatory decisions and advancing medical innovation.


The Educate the General Population on Data Privacy and Data Sharing project, within the Data Transparency Working Group has published video 2 of their series. The 'What Will I Receive and When Will I Receive It?The video covers topics such as the concept of consent to participate in a clinical trial, an overview of trial design and treatment procedures to develop a strong foundational understanding of clinical trials. To view the full series of videos created by this team, visit the PHUSE website


Image Added


The Enhanced Risk-based Quality Management (RBQM) Approaches for First-in-Human and/or Small Clinical Trialsa new project within the Risk Based Quality ManagementWorking Group, is now calling for volunteers. This project aims to to discuss and focus on a robust strategy/process and best practices for:

  • Identifying critical items
  • Risk Based data review approaches
  • Risk Based Monitoring approach strategy (tSDV/tSDR)
  • Usage of analytical tools and methods for data review & central monitoring, including limitations on (statistical) methodologies
  • Identification of thresholds or equivalent on limited patient data
  • Targeted medical review
  • Strategy to adequately anticipate on highly dynamic data
  • Establish links with the other work streams on FIH/small studies focus

If you would like to volunteer or learn more about this project, email workinggroups@phuse.global. Closing date: 5 July

Multiple projects within Working Groups are open to join. PHUSE welcomes new members who can apply their knowledge to bring fresh ideas and contribute to the ongoing work of PHUSE projects. For more information, click here, read the Welcome Pack or email workinggroups@phuse.global


Image Added


Working Groups Report: Includes project updates, recent and upcoming deliverables and future plans for each Working Group.

Monthly Mailings: The monthly newsletter. Here you will find a full update from each month of the year, easily accessible and divided into key areas of PHUSE.

PHUSE Blogs: Fancy a quick read? A blog is a perfect way to catch up on all things Working Groups. Get the lowdown on the latest events from across the globe and stay updated on industry topics brought to you by industry professionals. 


Image Added


Initiate and lead a new project under the PHUSE Working Groups umbrella. The new project must address problems of significant relevance to computational science related to drug,

biologic

biological and device development and must meet all of the guidelines for projects within the collaboration, including the following mandatory requirements: 

  • The projects must address significant research issues relevant to Computational Science
  • The project must not attempt to address FDA policy issues
  • There must be at least one Project Lead personally involved in planning and carrying out the project

New projects can be submitted anytime during the year, click here to submit

Image Removed

PHUSE Communications 

Working Groups Latest Report: Q12022

This Report provides a detailed overview of the projects progress this past quarter.Monthly Mailings: Our monthly newsletter. Here you will find a full update from each month of the year, easily accessible and divided into key areas of PHUSE

.

June 

Previous 2022 Monthly Mailings 

PHUSE Blogs

PHUSE Diversity & Inclusion Survey

Neurodiversity: Join the Conversation

Can Clinical Data processed with R be Used in a Regulatory Submission?

Pharma Statistical Programming Heads Council