Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Working Groups Hot Topics

PHUSE collaborations are organised into a number of specialist Working Groups, each with a broad topic area. The Working Groups have specific projects designed to achieve a set of particular objectives. This page will highlight the latest news and information from our projects. Participation is open to anyone who wants to contribute and if you would like to get involved, please email workinggroups@phuse.global.


PHUSE/FDA CSS 2024

Registration for the PHUSE/FDA CSS 2024 is open!

Come and be a part of the

Image Removed

Call for Posters and Registration Now Open! 

The

PHUSE/FDA Computational Science Symposium

will return for its 12th year from 18–20 September in Sliver

2024 (CSS) taking place 3–5 June in Silver Spring, MD.

Registration and Call for Posters is now open, click here to submit your 150-word abstract by 12 June, or contact workinggroups@phuse.global for more information. Be sure to register by 30 June to enjoy the PHUSE Early Bird discount. DT Summer Event: Register Now! 

Registration for this year's Data Transparency (DT) Summer Event is open! The DT Event will take place 20–22 June and will feature thought provoking presentations from specially selected experts within the data sharing field. Click here to register for all three days. 

New Real World Evidence Working Group! 

PHUSE are extremely proud to welcome the eighth PHUSE Working Group; Real World Evidence. The importance of this industry area has become increasingly apparent over recent years and the launch of this Working Group honours that. Working Group leads, Berber Snoeijer and David Hood, are looking forward to kicking off with exciting projects on real-world data sources, code and analysis techniques, and submission requirements. 

To volunteer for one or more projects within the new Real World Evidence Working Group, email workinggroups@phuse.global. 

Safety Analytics Webinar Series: Interdisciplinary Safety Evaluation for Learning and Decision-Making

The Safety Analytics Working Group will be delivering a series of virtual, free to attend webinars over the coming months. The first webinar will be on Scientific Evaluation of Safety Data and Aggregate Safety Assessment Planning for IND Safety Reporting and will be held on 15 June (15:00-16:30 BST). Click Here to Register.

Image Removed

Designing your RWD Study: Is Your Data Fit For Purpose?

The RWE Working Group will be hosting a community forum on Designing your RWD Study: Is Your Data Fit For Purpose? This Community Forum will take place on 6 July , 14:00–15:00(BST)/09:00–10:00 (EST). Please email workinggroups@phuse.global to register!

 Share your insights, discoveries and solutions with the PHUSE Community, who are eager to learn and collaborate. 

Status
colourBlue
titleRegister Here


Open Forum: Open Source in Pharma and Long-Term Dependability

Image Added

The Open Source Technology in Clinical Data Analytics (OSTCDA) project is hosting an Open Forum on the topic of Open Source in Pharma and Long-Term Dependability with speaker Mike Smith. This forum will be taking place on zoom on 17 May 15:00-16:00 BST / 10:00-11:00 EDT.

Status
colourBlue
titleRegister Here


New Deliverables

Image Added

The Best Data Practices for Rare Disease Patient Foundations and Researchers within the Real World Evidence Working Group, has published a new deliverable in the form of a Poster. The Poster provides an overview of Ensuring Registry Data Relevance and Reliability for Regulatory Use

The PHUSE data standards community, which is comprised of leaders and experts responsible for the governance and implementation of data standards across the biopharmaceutical industry, have authored and new White Paper. The Data Standards White Paper highlights current challenges in data standardisation across the biopharma industry and identify opportunities where we can work together to tackle them.

The SDTM ADaM Implementation FAQ within Optimizing the Use of Data Standards Working Group have published a new FAQ! The question they have answered is 'Naming Convention for Split RS Domain', you can view this question and the teams response viaValidation/Conformance Rules page. You can see all the FAQ this project has answered so far via here.

Do you have a SDTM ADaM question? You can send your questions to the team by emailing workinggroups@phuse.global.

The Quality Tolerance Limits project within the Risk Based Quality Management Working Group have published a new deliverable. The White Paper is on the topic of Assessing the Use of Quality Tolerance Limits in the Pharmaceutical Industry. This White Paper aims to provide the reader with valuable insights into the depth and breadth of the use of QTLs and addressing how QTLs are used in a wider scope of implementing RBQM.


Calling for Feedback 

The Treatment Emergent Definitions Recommendations project within Safety Analytics Working Group has produced a White Paper 'Recommended Definition of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events in Clinical Trials'.This document defines treatment-emergent events in Phase 1 to 4 clinical trials and integrated summary documents across therapeutic areas. The recommendations described herein were based on the authors’ collective experiences and a survey conducted by the PHUSE Treatment-Emergent Definition Recommendations project team [2] to solicit input from respondents on various TEAE scenarios for a simple clinical study design.

Please provide your comments by emailing workinggroups@phuse.global. Closing date for comments: 7 June


Calling for Feedback

The Comparing Analysis Method Implementations in Software (CAMIS) project, part of the Data Visualisation & Open Source Technology Working Group, have written a White Paper and are calling for your feedback! Explore this guidance document which identifies key considerations when understanding differences in statistical methodology implementations across programming languages. As the pharmaceutical industry increases their use of open source languages for clinical reporting, there is a vital need for discrepancies between open source languages and legacy software to be identified and documented. To avoid duplication of efforts across the industry, the CAMIS project has created a central GitHub repository to store these differences. This white paper highlights the importance of clear specification of statistical methodology in our documentation and calls for community collaboration to populate the repository with explanations of any known differences. Please submit your feedback to workinggroups@phuse.global by 12 June.

The SEND Industry Feedback Survey project, part of the Nonclinical Topics Working Group, are calling for your feedback on their 2023 survey! The aim of the survey is to expand on the results from last year’s topics and determine the reasons for the majority of respondents making manual edits and what solutions, such as automation, are being used to address them. Results of the survey will be presented at the PHUSE/FDA CSS. Please complete the survey by 19 June.

Recently Published Deliverables 

Patient foundations frequently develop and run patient registries, but deciding on the strategy, such as which data to collect and how to make sure it’s useful and meaningful, can be a challenge. The PHUSE project 'Best Data Practices for Rare Disease Patient Foundations and Researchers' was established to develop best data practices for patient foundations and researchers who work with them, inform industry of the registries run by patient communities, and build bridges between patients and industry, which will result in better data and inclusion of the patient voice into drug development. See all resent deliverables below. 

The Real World Evidence (RWE) Working Group’s recently published White Paper: ‘Requirements and Recommendations for Regulatory Submissions’.

The previous RWE Working Group released their first White Paper: ‘Basic Considerations for the Use of Real World Evidence in Support of Regulated Clinical Trial Submissionsin July 2020. Since then, the inclusion of real-world data in regulated clinical trials has gained significant prevalence. During the PHUSE/FDA Computational Science Symposium 2021, it became clear that companies are still insecure about the use of real-world data for regulatory submission trials due to lack of clear guidelines and standards. Since then, the FDA have released a number of draft guidelines on the use of real-world data for public review, which is discussed in this White Paper. It serves as a reference for relevant guidelines and articles related to the use of RWD/RWE for regulatory submissions.

Image Removed

Volunteer

Interested in volunteering?

Volunteer Opportunities

Image Added

TheEstimands for RWD/RWE a new project within Real World Evidence Working Group is now calling for volunteers. The focus of this project is on best practices of RWD estimands, not on their implementation using data standards. The team formed would have representation from the PHUSE Implementation of Estimands (ICH E9 (R1)) using Data Standards project team, which has a white paper nearing publication as of 2024Q1, and the Estimands Implementation Working Group (EIWG) sub team on HTA and RWE, both with estimands expertise, along with representation from teams under the RWE Working Group. 

If you would like to volunteer or learn more about this project, email workinggroups@phuse.global. Closing date: 7 June


Multiple projects within Working Groups are open to join. PHUSE welcomes new members who can apply their knowledge to bring fresh ideas and contribute to the ongoing work of PHUSE projects. For more information, clickhere

 or

, read the Welcome Pack

. If you would like to become a valued member of PHUSE and volunteer for one

or

multiple projects,


Announcement

TheOptimizing the Use of Data Standards Working Group are pleased to welcome to two New Leads to the team! The two new leads are Sandra VanPelt Nguyen and Edwin Van Stein.

Sandra has been involved with PHUSE since 2015, leading and supporting PHUSE projects under the Optimizing the Use of Data Standards and Real World Evidence Working Groups and Edwin is an active PHUSE member, contributing to the PHUSE EU Connect as a presenter, Stream Chair and Connect Chair, and as a PHUSE Wiki Administrator. He is currently a permanent member of the EU and US Connect Planning Committee and a Working Group Lead.

They will be joining the Current Leads Jane and Owns and Janet Low, you can learn more about the new leads via the Optimizing the Use of Data Standards page.


PHUSE Communications 

New Project Idea? 

Initiate and lead a new project under the PHUSE Working Groups umbrella. The new project must address problems of significant relevance to computational science related to drug, biologic and device development and must meet all of the guidelines for projects within the collaboration, including the following mandatory requirements: 

  • The projects must address significant research issues relevant to Computational Science
  • The project must not attempt to address FDA policy issues
  • There must be at least one Project Lead personally involved in planning and carrying out the project

New projects can be submitted anytime during the year, click here to submit. 

PHUSE Communications 

Working Groups Report: Includes project updates, recent and upcoming deliverables and the future plans for each Working Group.

Monthly Mailings: The monthly newsletter. Here you will find a full update from each month of the year, easily accessible and divided into key areas of PHUSE.

PHUSE Blogs: Fancy a quick read? A blog is the a perfect way to catch up on all things Working Groups. Get the lowdown on the latest events from across the globe and stay updated on industry topics bought brought to you by industry professionals


New Project Idea? 

Initiate and lead a new project under the PHUSE Working Groups umbrella. The new project must address problems of significant relevance to computational science related to drug, biological and device development and must meet all of the guidelines for projects within the collaboration, including the following mandatory requirements: 

  • The projects must address significant research issues relevant to Computational Science
  • The project must not attempt to address FDA policy issues
  • There must be at least one Project Lead personally involved in planning and carrying out the project

New projects can be submitted anytime during the year, click here to submit